Adam, S. (2004). Using Learning Outcomes: A consideration of the nature, role, application and implications for European education of employing learning outcomes at the local, national and international levels. Conference Background Report on United Kingdom Bologna Seminar, July 2004, Herriot-Watt University. http://media.ehea.info/file/Learning_Outcomes_Edinburgh_2004/78/7/Learning_Outcomes_Edinburgh_2004_577787.zip. Accessed 20 Jan 2017.
Albrecht, K. (1992). The only thing that matters: bringing the power of the customer into the center of your business. New York: HarperBusiness.
Google Scholar
Allen, T. J., & O’Shea, R. P. (2014). Introduction. In T. J. Allen & R. P. O’Shea (Eds.), Building technology transfer within research universities: an entrepreneurial approach (pp. 1–10). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Altmann, P., Li, J. (2011). The novelty of Open Innovation. Halmstad University Dissertations. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:471149/FULLTEXT01.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2016.
Amit, R., & Zott, C. (2001). Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 493–520.
Article
Google Scholar
Ang, S., & Jospeh, D. (1996). Organizational learning and learning organizations: trigger events, processes, and structures. http://www.ntu.edu.sg/home/adjoseph/webpages/publications/aom10.pdf. Accessed 1 November 2016.
Google Scholar
Baume, D. (2009). Writing and using good learning outcomes. Resource document. Leeds Metropolitan University. http://swcarpentry.github.io/instructor-training/files/papers/baumelearning-outcomes-2009.pdf. Accessed 26 Jan 2017.
Bergold, J., & Thomas, S. (2012). Participatory Research Methods: A Methodological Approach in Motion. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 13(1). http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1801/3334. Accessed 3 November 2016.
Big Data Universe Beginning to Explode. (2012). CSC. http://www.csc.com/insights/flxwd/78931-big_data_universe_beginning_to_explode. Accessed 14 May 2016.
Big Data, for better or worse: 90% of world’s data generated over last two years. (2013). SINTEF. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/05/130522085217.htm. Accessed 14 May 2016.
Biggs, J. B. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university. Buckingham: The Open University Press.
Google Scholar
Birks, M., & Mills, J. (2015). Grounded theory: a practical guide (2nd ed.). London: SAGE Publications.
Google Scholar
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals. Handbook I: cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Company.
Google Scholar
Bright, T. (2016). Moore’s law really is dead this time. WIRED Media: Ars Technica and WIRED. http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/02/moores-law-really-is-dead-this-time. Accessed 14 May 2016
Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2015). Business research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Cameron, E., & Green, M. (2009). Making sense of change management: a complete guide to the models, tools & techniques of organizational change. London and Philadelphia: Kogan Page.
Google Scholar
Capturing The Value of Project Management Through Knowledge Transfer. (2015). Resource document. PMI. https://www.pmi.org/~/media/PDF/learning/capturing-value-knowledge-transfer.ashx. Accessed 14 May 2016.
Carley, K. (1993). Coding choices for textual analysis: a comparison of content analysis and map analysis. Sociological Methodology, 23, 75–126.
Article
Google Scholar
Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Google Scholar
Chesbrough, H. W., & Bogers, M. (2014). Explicating open innovation: clarifying an emerging paradigm for understanding innovation. In H. W. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke, & J. West (Eds.), New frontiers in open innovation (pp. 3–28). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Chesbrough, H. W., & Di Minin, A. (2014). Open social innovation. In H. W. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke, & J. West (Eds.), New frontiers in open innovation (pp. 169–188). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Chevalier, J. M., & Buckles, D. (2013). Participatory action research: theory and methods for engaged inquiry. New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Combe, M. (2014). Change Readiness: Focusing Change Management Where it Counts. PMI. http://www.peakperformancepm.com.au/uploads/32766/ufiles/Focusing-Change-Management-Where-it-Counts.pdf. Accessed 20 January 2017.
Cowan, N. (2010). The magical mystery four: How is working memory capacity limited, and Why? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(1), 51–57.
Article
Google Scholar
Daft, R. L. (2010). Organization theory and design. Mason: South-Western Cengage Learning.
Google Scholar
De Geus, A. P. (1988). Planning as learning. Harvard Business Review, 66(2), 70–74.
Google Scholar
Deming, W. E. (1993). The New economics for industry, government, education (2nd ed.). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Drucker, P. F. (1954). The practice of management. New York: Harper & Row.
Google Scholar
Drucker, P. F. (1999). Management challenges for the 21st century. New York: HarperBusiness.
Google Scholar
Dubickis, M., & Gaile-Sarkane, E. (2015). Perspectives on innovation and technology transfer. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 213, 965–970.
Article
Google Scholar
Dubickis, M., & Gaile-Sarkane, E. (2017). Tacit vs explicit knowledge dichotomy: state-of-the-art review for technology transfer purposes. In M. H. Bilgin, H. Danis, E. Demir, & U. Can (Eds.), Financial environment and business development (pp. 423–433). Cham: Springer International Publishing Switzerland.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Effectiveness (n.d.). WebFinance. http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/effectiveness.html. Accessed 14 May 2016
Efficacy. (n.d.). American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Ed. (2011). http://www.thefreedictionary.com/efficacy. Accessed 14 May 2016
Efficiency. (n.d.). The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Ed. (2013). http://www.yourdictionary.com/efficiency. Accessed 14 May 2016
Ezzy, D. (2002). Qualitative analysis: practice and innovation. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Fals-Borda, O. (1995). Research for social justice: some north–south convergences. http://comm-org.wisc.edu/si/falsborda.htm. Accessed 14 May 2016.
Google Scholar
Fifield, P. (2007). Marketing strategy: the difference between marketing and markets (3rd ed.). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinneman.
Google Scholar
Flay, B. R., Biglan, A., Boruch, R. F., Gonzalez Castro, F., Gottfredson, D., Kellam, S., Moscicki, E. K., Schinke, S., Valentine, J. C., & Ji, P. (2005). Standards of evidence: criteria for efficacy, effectiveness and dissemination. Prevention Science, 6(3), 151–175.
Article
Google Scholar
Foray, D., & Lundvall, B.-A. (2014). The knowledge-based economy: from the economics of knowledge to the learning economy. In D. Neef, G. A. Siesfeld, & J. Cefola (Eds.), The economic impact of knowledge (pp. 115–122). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinneman.
Google Scholar
Gee, S. (1981). Technology Transfer, Innovation and International Competitiveness, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Groen, A. J., & Linton, J. D. (2010). Is open innovation a field of study or a communication barrier to theory development? Technovation, 30(11–12), 554.
Article
Google Scholar
Gunelius, S. (2014). The data explosion in 2014 minute by minute – infographic. http://aci.info/2014/07/12/the-data-explosion-in-2014-minute-by-minute-infographic. Accessed 14 May 2016.
Google Scholar
Harden, R. M. (2002). Editorial: developments in outcome-based education. Medical Teacher, 24(2), 117–120.
Article
Google Scholar
History of Learning Theories. (2014). Faculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong. http://kb.edu.hku.hk/index.php?id=5. Accessed 4 November 2016.
Hockey, R. (2013). The psychology of fatigue: work, effort and control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Book
Google Scholar
Hutcherson, R. (2014). Organizational optimization. Bloomington: AuthorHouse.
Google Scholar
Iacono, J. C., Brown, A., & Holtham, C. (2011). The use of the case study method in theory testing: the example of steel eMarketplaces. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 9(1), 57–65.
Google Scholar
Jenkins, A., & Unwin, D. (2001). How to write learning outcomes. https://www.ubalt.edu/cas/faculty/faculty-matters/How%20to%20write%20student%20learning%20outcomes.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2016.
Google Scholar
Jensen, R. J., & Szulanski, G. (2007). Template use and the effectiveness of knowledge transfer. Management Science, 53(11), 1716–1730.
Article
Google Scholar
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2004). Strategy maps: converting intangible assets into tangible outcomes. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
Google Scholar
Kennedey, D. (2009). Writing and using learning outcomes: a practical guide. Cork: Quality Promotion Unit, University College Cork.
Google Scholar
Kolb, D. A. (1976). Management and the learning process. California Management Review, 18(3), 21–31.
Article
Google Scholar
Kotler, P. (2003). Marketing insights from A to Z: 80 concepts every manager needs to know. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
Google Scholar
Kotler, P., & Armstrong, G. (2014). Principles of marketing. Upper Saddle River: Pearson.
Google Scholar
Kotler, P., Kartajaya, H., & Setiawan, I. (2010). Marketing 3.0: from products to customers to the human spirit. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Book
Google Scholar
Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives, the classification of educational goals. Handbook II: affective domain. New York: David McKay Company.
Google Scholar
Kumar, N. (2004). Marketing as strategy: understanding the CEO’s agenda for driving growth and innovation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Google Scholar
LaChapelle, N. (2008). The structure of concern: a challenge for thinkers. USA: Lulu Press.
Google Scholar
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131–150.
Article
Google Scholar
Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of topological psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Book
Google Scholar
Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46.
Article
Google Scholar
Lunenburg, F. C. (2011). Expectancy theory of motivation: motivating by altering expectations. International Journal of Management, Business, and Administration, 15(1), 1–6.
Google Scholar
Marley, J. (2000). Editorial: efficacy, effectiveness, efficiency. Australian Prescriber, 23(6), 114–115.
Article
Google Scholar
Melkers, J., Bulger, D., & Bozeman, L. (1993). Technology transfer and economic development. In: R. Bingham & R. Mier (Eds.), Theories of local economic development: Perspectives from Across the Disciplines (pp. 232–247). Newbury Park: Sage.
McNiff, J., & Whitehead, J. (2011). All You need to know about action research. London: SAGE Publications.
Google Scholar
McNiff, J., Lomax, P., & Whitehead, J. (1996). You and your action research project. London: Routledge.
Book
Google Scholar
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81–97.
Article
Google Scholar
Mintzberg, H. (2000). The rise and fall of strategic planning. Edinburgh: Pearson Education Limited.
Google Scholar
Nieminen, M., & Lehtoranta, O. (2015). Measuring broad-based innovation. Espoo: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland.
Google Scholar
O’Brien, R. (1998). An overview of the methodological approach of action research. http://www.web.ca/~robrien/papers/arfinal.html. Accessed 14 May 2016.
Google Scholar
O’Nelll, G., Murphy, F. (2010). Assessment. Guide to taxonomies of Learning. Resource document. University College Dublin. http://www.ucd.ie/t4cms/ucdtla0034.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2016.
Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., Bernarda, G., & Smith, A. (2014). Value proposition design: How to create products and services customers want. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Google Scholar
Ostroff, C., & Schmitt, N. (1993). Configurations of organizational effectiveness and efficiency. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1345–1361.
Article
Google Scholar
Pennings, J.M., Goodman, P.S. (1976). A Framework of Organizational Effectiveness. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association (71st, New York, New York, August 30-September 3, 1976) and the Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association (84th, Washington, D.C., September 3–7, 1976). http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED132672.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2016
Pfefer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (2003). The external control of organizations: a resource dependence perspective. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Google Scholar
Phillips, R. (2002). Technology business incubators: How effective as technology transfer mechanisms? Technology in Society, 24(3), 299–316.
Article
Google Scholar
Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press.
Google Scholar
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2007). Strategy & society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing.
Google Scholar
Quinn, R. E., & Rohrbaugh, J. (1983). A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis. Management Science, 29(3), 363–377.
Article
Google Scholar
Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of Innovations. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.
Rogers, E. M., Takegami, S., & Yin, J. (2001). Lessons learned about technology transfer. Technovation, 21(4), 253–261.
Article
Google Scholar
Rothwell, R. (1992). Successful industrial innovation: critical factors for the 1990s. R&D Management, 22(3), 221–240.
Article
Google Scholar
Roy, J. A. (2003). An approach to privatization in the 21st century. Bloomington: AuthorHouse.
Google Scholar
Sazali, A. W., & Raduan, C. R. (2011). The handbook of inter firm technology transfer: an integrated knowledge-based view and organizational learning perspective. Germany: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.
Google Scholar
Schilling, D. R. (2013). Knowledge doubling every 12 months, soon to be every 12 hours. http://www.industrytap.com/knowledge-doubling-every-12-months-soon-to-be-every-12-hours/3950. Accessed 14 May 2016.
Google Scholar
Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective. New York, NY, England: Macmillan Publishing Co, Inc.
Seidle, R. J. (2013). The implications of organizational learning types for technological innovation. Montreal: McGill University Desautels Faculty of Management.
Google Scholar
Simonite, T. (2016). Moore’s Law is Dead. Now What? MIT Technology Review. https://www.technologyreview.com/s/601441/moores-law-is-dead-now-what. Accessed 14 May 2016.
Simpson, E. J. (1972). The classification of educational objectives in the psychomotor domain. Washington, DC: Gryphon House.
Google Scholar
Smith, A. (2016). How to write social sciences research paper: for students and professionals. USA: Lulu Press.
Google Scholar
Spady, W. (1994). Outcome-based education: critical isues and answers. Arlington: American Association of School Administrators.
Google Scholar
Technology Quarterly: After Moore’s Law. (2016). The Economist. http://www.economist.com/technology-quarterly/2016-03-12/after-moores-law. Accessed 14 May 2016.
Teece, D. J. (1981). The Market for Know-How and the Efficient International Transfer of Technology. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 458, 81-96.
Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 172–194.
Article
Google Scholar
Tones, K., & Tilford, S. (1994). Health promotion: effectiveness, efficiency and equity. London: Chapman & Hall.
Google Scholar
Trott, P., & Hartmann, D. (2009). Why ‘open Innovation’ is old wine in new bottles. International Journal of Innovation Management, 13(4), 715–736.
Article
Google Scholar
Turner, V., Gantz, J.F., Reinsel, D., Minton, S. (2014). The Digital Universe of Opportunities: Rich Data and the Increasing Value of the Internet of Things. Executive Summary: Data Growth, Business Opportunities, and the IT Imperatives. IDC. https://www.emc.com/leadership/digital-universe/2014iview/executive-summary.htm. Accessed 26 Jan 2017.
Vanhaverbeke, W., & Chesbrough, H. W. (2014). A classification of open innovation and open business models. In H. W. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke, & J. West (Eds.), New frontiers in open innovation (pp. 50–68). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Von Krogh, G. (2011). Is open innovation a field of study or a communication barrier to theory development? a commentary. Technovation, 31(7), 286.
Article
Google Scholar
Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar
Waldrop, M.M. (2016). The chips are down for Moore’s law. Nature Publishing Group. http://www.nature.com/news/the-chips-are-down-for-moore-s-law-1.19338. Accessed 14 May 2016.
Webster, F. E. (2002). Market-driven management: How to define, develop, and deliver customer value. New York: Wiley.
Google Scholar
Weiner, B.J. (2009). A theory of organizational readiness for change. Implementation Science. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-67.
Winter, R. (1996). Some principles and procedures for the conduct of action research. In O. Zuber-Skerritt (Ed.), New directions in action research (pp. 9–22). London: Falmer Press.
Google Scholar
Woollaston, V. (2016). Learning new facts really DOES push out old ones: our brains only have a ‘limited amount of space’ for skills and knowledge. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3498469/Learning-new-facts-really-DOES-push-old-ones-Study-discovers-brain-limited-space.html. Accessed 14 May 2016.
Google Scholar
Yin, R. (2012). Applications of case study research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Google Scholar